CASt

CASt|Cloud Automation Strategy

TheOperating Modelbehind technology spend

A working platform plus the team to install it. Vendor, contract, and architecture decisions governed on one cadence. Finance-validated baselines, renewal control, and audit-ready savings, yours to run.

Vendor-neutral
Execution-first
Audit-ready
Multi-vertical
Sample platform live view
Active

Active engagements

14

+3 QTD

Realized savings

$11.8M

Finance-validated

Renewal cliff (90d)

$4.2M

Under governance

Run rate vs Adjusted Baseline

12-month projection

Glidepath

Material reduction by Year 1

View live →

Sample data. Your engagement populates with your own.

Vendor-neutral

No commissions, kickbacks, or referral fees

Finance-validated

Baselines, billing proof, sign-off

Architecture-led

Decisions across the IT estate

Embedded execution

Stood up alongside your team

The CASt Platform

A working platform, not a deliverable that ages on a shelf.

Pre-built industry verticals, multi-entity support, GL-validated baselines, contract governance, architecture overlap scoring, savings pipelines, and compliance frameworks. We stand it up alongside your team and hand it off as your operating model.

Multi-entity spend reconciliation

GL-validated spend rolled up across acquirer + targets with vendor name normalization and contract matching.

Renewal cliff visualization

Quarterly renewal pipeline with auto-renew flags, notice windows, and BAA / coverage gaps surfaced.

Architecture overlap scoring

Function-by-function platform analysis (competing, overlapping, or unique) with migration complexity ratings.

Net Y1 savings model

Every consolidation opportunity sized with gross savings, migration cost, and operational impact.

Compliance frameworks

Vertical-specific regulatory lens (HIPAA, GLBA, CMMC, ITAR, GDPR, PCI-DSS) baked into the data model.

Long-tail vendor visibility

Cumulative concentration curves surface the 100-300 vendor tail where hidden risk lives.

Who CASt is for

Built for the executives who own the spend.

Vendor, contract, and architecture decisions sit across the C-suite. The operating model gives each executive the same record to work from.

For the CEO

Defend the operating model behind the spend.

Board and investors ask what's in the budget and why. CASt installs the cadence and artifacts so technology decisions are explainable on one page (renewals, vendor consolidation, savings) without depending on the next strategic plan to surface them.

For the CFO

Make every dollar defensible.

Software and infrastructure spend rolls forward by inertia. CASt builds the baseline, the renewal calendar, and the savings ledger Finance can sign. The budget is the budget because of ROI, not because it was last year's number.

For the rest of the C-Suite

Different roles. Same operating record.

CIO running the roadmap. CISO managing vendor risk. CGO and CRO scaling go-to-market. CINO standing up new capability. CHRO and CPO consolidating the systems that surround the workforce and the supply chain. CASt installs the contract, vendor, and architecture record they all rely on, governed on one cadence regardless of how the org chart is drawn.

CIOCISOCGOCROCINOCHROCPO

Who We Serve

Same operating shell. Three plays.

One operating model. Three deployment motions. Whether you sponsor a portfolio, run an enterprise vendor function, or shape a transaction, the platform and methodology are the same. The framing changes.

One client. One platform. Architected to fit.

Every engagement runs on its own dedicated platform instance, architected around the client's data, vendors, and governance. No shared tenancy. No cross-contamination across portfolios, deals, or competitors.

Vertical Coverage

Industry verticals are all different.

Each one ships with the right regulatory lens, industry-specific entity fields, and pre-modeled deal patterns. Financial Services is the lead reference vertical.

How It Works

From data ingest to ongoing governance.

Four phases that move the vendor conversation off slides and onto a working operating cadence.

01

Ingest

GL exports, contract documents, vendor records from acquirer and each target.

02

Reconcile

Vendor name normalization, GL-to-contract matching, intercompany exclusion.

03

Analyze

Consolidation candidates, renewal exposure, compliance gaps, savings sized with net economics.

04

Govern

Ongoing renewal calendar, spend gates, vendor rationalization roadmap.

Why CASt

Three principles every engagement holds.

Vendor-neutral by design

No vendor commissions, kickbacks, referral fees, or revenue shares. CASt is compensated by clients only. Every recommendation is conflict-free.

Execution-first operating model

We embed with Finance and IT to run renewals, negotiations, baselines, and governance, not leave a deck and walk out.

Audit-ready measurement

Savings tied to baselines, billing proof, and client sign-off. CFOs and operating teams can defend every number in the ledger.

Proof

Outcomes you can defend in a budget meeting.

What an engagement looks like in practice, measured against your own baseline, not industry averages.

Material savings

Realized and forward

Vendor consolidation, contract renegotiation, and cloud rightsizing, sized against your baseline.

Finance-validated

Every savings claim

Tied to baselines, billing proof, and Finance sign-off. No story-only numbers.

Early governance

Operating before quarter-end

Inventory, renewal calendar, baseline, and exception handling under control from day one.

Next step

Walk your renewal calendar with CASt.

We start with the renewals already in your current cycle and build the baseline together. Pick a vertical that matches your context and we'll walk a representative deal end to end.